Pmisley wrote:1. This movie is gonna be terrible anyways.
2. Tom has turned a bit looney after Scientology.
3. Brendan Frasier Mummy or nothing!
Lmao ha ha ha ha #frasierornithing
Pmisley wrote:1. This movie is gonna be terrible anyways.
2. Tom has turned a bit looney after Scientology.
3. Brendan Frasier Mummy or nothing!

ocwankenobi wrote:I think a lot of it has to do with a negative bias towards Michael Bay.



mattbs wrote:This was probably a life size pop and Tom wants you to think he is tall so he squashed it...
wsm10 wrote:Abesapien2 wrote:Ar7 wrote:
Had to double check to see if this was an exaggeration. But yup, it's at 16%, SNAP! Maybe it's one of those it's so bad it's good? Meh. Don't think I've ever seen a "big" movie with that low a rating. Crazy.
I liked it. Action check. popcorn check. Crazy monsters check.
I can't say much about the mummy since I haven't watched, but honestly Transformers wasn't THAT bad, as in its rating. That series has never been great and a few weren't even good, but they had more value than rotten tomatoes gives them credit for. For some reason, the critics have always had this weird hatred for the Transformers movies that goes beyond dislike of the movies. Another example is The Dark Tower, it's currently at 17% and it wasn't bad at all. I wouldn't say one of the greatest movies ever, but it was good for sure. I seriously think movie reviewers are some of the oddest people on the planet. Some of the worst things you'll ever see are rated better than decent movies.
I will say, I'm a little biased on the Transformers though. I've wanted more pops of them for the longest time.
mikechickenhead wrote:ocwankenobi wrote:I think a lot of it has to do with a negative bias towards Michael Bay.
THIS is probably the truth...
I personally dont like michael bay... not everything NEEDS to blow up. HA! The guy put explosions in his Friday the 13th remake for crying out loud!
wsm10 wrote:mikechickenhead wrote:ocwankenobi wrote:I think a lot of it has to do with a negative bias towards Michael Bay.
THIS is probably the truth...
I personally dont like michael bay... not everything NEEDS to blow up. HA! The guy put explosions in his Friday the 13th remake for crying out loud!
I think @ocwankenobi may be right, but he's a little different for sure. I never saw that Ft13 remake, it didn't look good at all. That's saying a lot, because I love horror movies. I will say though, I had no idea Michael Bay was involved. Are you serious he put explosions in that one too? He may be a good example of a SFX guy who got too much power. No one can deny his excellence in destruction, that's for sure.



mikechickenhead wrote:wsm10 wrote:mikechickenhead wrote:THIS is probably the truth...
I personally dont like michael bay... not everything NEEDS to blow up. HA! The guy put explosions in his Friday the 13th remake for crying out loud!
I think @ocwankenobi may be right, but he's a little different for sure. I never saw that Ft13 remake, it didn't look good at all. That's saying a lot, because I love horror movies. I will say though, I had no idea Michael Bay was involved. Are you serious he put explosions in that one too? He may be a good example of a SFX guy who got too much power. No one can deny his excellence in destruction, that's for sure.
yeah..he has jason setting up traps and all sorts of weird stuff.
slightecho wrote:1. Brendan Frasier pop or bust. "I would have enjoyed this pop line more if I had GOTTEN MY BRENDAN FRASIER POP!!!" (shoutout and brownie points if you understood that reference)
2. Tom Cruise may have just singlehandedly made this pop go from the clearance bin to one of the most stupidly sought after pops ever
3. Darn it. We could have had the first life size pop of a person.
slightecho wrote:1. Brendan Frasier pop or bust. "I would have enjoyed this pop line more if I had GOTTEN MY BRENDAN FRASIER POP!!!" (shoutout and brownie points if you understood that reference)
2. Tom Cruise may have just singlehandedly made this pop go from the clearance bin to one of the most stupidly sought after pops ever
3. Darn it. We could have had the first life size pop of a person.
Lobstercrossing wrote:Wouldn't mind getting my hands on THAT proto
Icetenka wrote:Lobstercrossing wrote:Wouldn't mind getting my hands on THAT proto
Saw the Proto on eBay for $750!

Lobstercrossing wrote:Icetenka wrote:Lobstercrossing wrote:Wouldn't mind getting my hands on THAT proto
Saw the Proto on eBay for $750!
wowzers!
Edit: To be honest, I'm surprised it's not listed for more. I'm sure there have been plenty of legit pops that have been released with protos that have pulled much more in value. Ok, I'm going to stop talking about this so I don't end up trying to justify purchasing it, LOL.
ShockWaveZ55 wrote:I blame Scientology.

Icetenka wrote:Lobstercrossing wrote:Icetenka wrote:
Saw the Proto on eBay for $750!
wowzers!
Edit: To be honest, I'm surprised it's not listed for more. I'm sure there have been plenty of legit pops that have been released with protos that have pulled much more in value. Ok, I'm going to stop talking about this so I don't end up trying to justify purchasing it, LOL.
Just be careful if you do decide to change your mind about purchasing it. I read a post regarding fakes out there. Make sure you try to get as much information to validate that the person was at Fundays.

theoneupper02 wrote:Rgncajun wrote:Macmill22 wrote:Has anyone seen any that got released on accident? People are going crazy over them.
Apparently, it mostly happened in vegas.
This particular story is pretty funny to me. The Mummy really was a HORRIBLE movie...I don't think anyone was really excited about the line of pops. But surely enough, when it is no longer readily available and there is a unique story behind it...the price skyrockets.
I think it's all hype anyways. Regardless of how limited this pop is...only a true collector and fan would shell out money for it.

Macmill22 wrote:Yeah I refused to watch the movie. I preferred the Brendan Fraser ones




Deathlinks wrote:WErent some of these sent out and bought already?
POPBatman wrote:Macmill22 wrote:Yeah I refused to watch the movie. I preferred the Brendan Fraser ones
I didn't watch either. Both because I didn't like the reboot choice and that Scientology thing but I'm happy with my choice since its apparently crap
Now can we get Fraser Mummy POPs?



Rickakatuna wrote:Pmisley wrote:1. This movie is gonna be terrible anyways.
2. Tom has turned a bit looney after Scientology.
3. Brendan Frasier Mummy or nothing!
Lmao ha ha ha ha #frasierornithing

Pop Madness wrote:This made me realize that I don't remember ever seeing any Tom Cruise pop.

conventiongeek wrote:I love the Frazer Mummy movies... but please do not make a pop of the Scorpion King. that was awful. Unless they make fun of the bad CGI.

Users browsing this forum: nightbodega