mongoose12 wrote:this title will change hands over and over again. either way, still an impressive distinction
FACTS
mongoose12 wrote:this title will change hands over and over again. either way, still an impressive distinction
He-Mann wrote:
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
BobbleheadFreak wrote:He-Mann wrote:
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
Wonder if he would trade some of those dupes
He-Mann wrote:BigM wrote:New record as of 11/15/2020
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/wo ... pcBS0bPBcM
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
BobbleheadFreak wrote:He-Mann wrote:
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
Wonder if he would trade some of those dupes
BobbleheadFreak wrote:He-Mann wrote:
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
Wonder if he would trade some of those dupes
daOCHO wrote:BobbleheadFreak wrote:He-Mann wrote:
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
Wonder if he would trade some of those dupes
I wonder what his ISO is?
Imagery wrote:He-Mann wrote:BigM wrote:New record as of 11/15/2020
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/wo ... pcBS0bPBcM
So are duplicates counted for the record? In the photo I see dupes.
This definitely feels like a matter of quantity over quality
rexflexall wrote:I can barely keep a few hundred around LOL!
Fugly16 wrote:rexflexall wrote:I can barely keep a few hundred around LOL!
Yeah no room. Would have to rent storage unit and divorce my wife .
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]