
Coming this fall.
https://www.funko.com/blog/article/comi ... -royals-1/










CaseyJones14 wrote:I don't think I'll ever understand the fascination with the Royal Family, but I'm sure this will make lots of people happy.



December 2016 Collector of the Month! 2021 Hall of Fame!


StarWarner wrote:Spoiler: show
Coming this fall.
https://www.funko.com/blog/article/comi ... -royals-1/
Kent Chua

racheva wrote:CaseyJones14 wrote:I don't think I'll ever understand the fascination with the Royal Family, but I'm sure this will make lots of people happy.
Ditto. Like, they’re celebrities, but also real people? Who are famous for not really any accomplishments. Maybe you have to be British.


StarWarner wrote:racheva wrote:CaseyJones14 wrote:I don't think I'll ever understand the fascination with the Royal Family, but I'm sure this will make lots of people happy.
Ditto. Like, they’re celebrities, but also real people? Who are famous for not really any accomplishments. Maybe you have to be British.
I know many who are not British and are obsessed. I have British heritage, but I'm fascinated by royalty in general, not just the Windsors. Part of my fascination also has to do with history and part to do with fashion.


pinklaquer wrote:StarWarner wrote:racheva wrote:
Ditto. Like, they’re celebrities, but also real people? Who are famous for not really any accomplishments. Maybe you have to be British.
I know many who are not British and are obsessed. I have British heritage, but I'm fascinated by royalty in general, not just the Windsors. Part of my fascination also has to do with history and part to do with fashion.
Very true and well said! They are known for their philanthropy and humanitarian efforts.




StarWarner wrote:pinklaquer wrote:StarWarner wrote:I know many who are not British and are obsessed. I have British heritage, but I'm fascinated by royalty in general, not just the Windsors. Part of my fascination also has to do with history and part to do with fashion.
Very true and well said! They are known for their philanthropy and humanitarian efforts.
That's true. I would never say the current British Royal family has not accomplished anything. I'm not saying they don't have their faults, everyone does. But many of them have done amazing work for people all over the world.

racheva wrote:StarWarner wrote:pinklaquer wrote:
Very true and well said! They are known for their philanthropy and humanitarian efforts.
That's true. I would never say the current British Royal family has not accomplished anything. I'm not saying they don't have their faults, everyone does. But many of them have done amazing work for people all over the world.
I didn’t say that they hadn’t accomplished anything. I said that they’re famous just by being born. They’d be famous even if they accomplished nothing. That’s why I don’t get the concept of a royal family. It’s the same for kids of celebrities, tbh.



NCDS wrote:racheva wrote:StarWarner wrote:That's true. I would never say the current British Royal family has not accomplished anything. I'm not saying they don't have their faults, everyone does. But many of them have done amazing work for people all over the world.
I didn’t say that they hadn’t accomplished anything. I said that they’re famous just by being born. They’d be famous even if they accomplished nothing. That’s why I don’t get the concept of a royal family. It’s the same for kids of celebrities, tbh.
I admit I don't get it either. Yet my mom was glued to the TV that day to watch the wedding. I was informed the dress was very plain.


StarWarner wrote:NCDS wrote:racheva wrote:
I didn’t say that they hadn’t accomplished anything. I said that they’re famous just by being born. They’d be famous even if they accomplished nothing. That’s why I don’t get the concept of a royal family. It’s the same for kids of celebrities, tbh.
I admit I don't get it either. Yet my mom was glued to the TV that day to watch the wedding. I was informed the dress was very plain.
I agree that children of celebrities are famous just for being born. I just feel the royals are famous for a bit more than that.
Meghan's dress was simple but very elegant like Audrey Hepburn's style.




NCDS wrote:StarWarner wrote:NCDS wrote:
I admit I don't get it either. Yet my mom was glued to the TV that day to watch the wedding. I was informed the dress was very plain.
I agree that children of celebrities are famous just for being born. I just feel the royals are famous for a bit more than that.
Meghan's dress was simple but very elegant like Audrey Hepburn's style.
I'm guessing the bit more is because they were born with a title? To me their title means nothing they are just rich kids. No different than Paris Hilton.
Don't let my mom catch me saying that though I might get disowned. Though her attachment I think is more because they are Princess Diana's kids and she loved her.
It's all good though because I also don't understand why people like sports either.




Lonikins wrote:NCDS wrote:StarWarner wrote:I agree that children of celebrities are famous just for being born. I just feel the royals are famous for a bit more than that.
Meghan's dress was simple but very elegant like Audrey Hepburn's style.
I'm guessing the bit more is because they were born with a title? To me their title means nothing they are just rich kids. No different than Paris Hilton.
Don't let my mom catch me saying that though I might get disowned. Though her attachment I think is more because they are Princess Diana's kids and she loved her.
It's all good though because I also don't understand why people like sports either.
I would definitely not compare Harry and William to Paris Hilton - they've been brought up with far more spotlight on them than any rich child and they've been groomed to be contributing members of society. William and Harry were both in the military and they do extensive charitable work, which is far more than I can say for Paris HiltonWho would probably wouldn't be on the same level as them if she hadn't put out a certain video - and even now her star has faded pretty far.
There's a lot a Queen/King has to actually do even if they aren't the actual ruling head of the nation - I've learned a lot watching Victoria and the Crown. I don't think I would ever want to be Queen of a nation (but I probably also don't want to be President)



NCDS wrote:Lonikins wrote:NCDS wrote:
I'm guessing the bit more is because they were born with a title? To me their title means nothing they are just rich kids. No different than Paris Hilton.
Don't let my mom catch me saying that though I might get disowned. Though her attachment I think is more because they are Princess Diana's kids and she loved her.
It's all good though because I also don't understand why people like sports either.
I would definitely not compare Harry and William to Paris Hilton - they've been brought up with far more spotlight on them than any rich child and they've been groomed to be contributing members of society. William and Harry were both in the military and they do extensive charitable work, which is far more than I can say for Paris HiltonWho would probably wouldn't be on the same level as them if she hadn't put out a certain video - and even now her star has faded pretty far.
There's a lot a Queen/King has to actually do even if they aren't the actual ruling head of the nation - I've learned a lot watching Victoria and the Crown. I don't think I would ever want to be Queen of a nation (but I probably also don't want to be President)
That's a fair point, I really meant I don't get it. I can say though I am glad they are using being brought up in the spotlight to do far better things than a reality TV Show. I have watched both of those shows and they are entertaining.





sambunctious10 wrote:Love the detail from the wedding ceremony.
Lonikins wrote:NCDS wrote:Lonikins wrote:
I would definitely not compare Harry and William to Paris Hilton - they've been brought up with far more spotlight on them than any rich child and they've been groomed to be contributing members of society. William and Harry were both in the military and they do extensive charitable work, which is far more than I can say for Paris HiltonWho would probably wouldn't be on the same level as them if she hadn't put out a certain video - and even now her star has faded pretty far.
There's a lot a Queen/King has to actually do even if they aren't the actual ruling head of the nation - I've learned a lot watching Victoria and the Crown. I don't think I would ever want to be Queen of a nation (but I probably also don't want to be President)
That's a fair point, I really meant I don't get it. I can say though I am glad they are using being brought up in the spotlight to do far better things than a reality TV Show. I have watched both of those shows and they are entertaining.
Totally fair - we weren't raised in a country where monarchies are the norm. Some countries just really don't like change apparently



Lonikins wrote:NCDS wrote:StarWarner wrote:I agree that children of celebrities are famous just for being born. I just feel the royals are famous for a bit more than that.
Meghan's dress was simple but very elegant like Audrey Hepburn's style.
I'm guessing the bit more is because they were born with a title? To me their title means nothing they are just rich kids. No different than Paris Hilton.
Don't let my mom catch me saying that though I might get disowned. Though her attachment I think is more because they are Princess Diana's kids and she loved her.
It's all good though because I also don't understand why people like sports either.
I would definitely not compare Harry and William to Paris Hilton - they've been brought up with far more spotlight on them than any rich child and they've been groomed to be contributing members of society. William and Harry were both in the military and they do extensive charitable work, which is far more than I can say for Paris HiltonWho would probably wouldn't be on the same level as them if she hadn't put out a certain video - and even now her star has faded pretty far.
There's a lot a Queen/King has to actually do even if they aren't the actual ruling head of the nation - I've learned a lot watching Victoria and the Crown. I don't think I would ever want to be Queen of a nation (but I probably also don't want to be President)

Users browsing this forum: No registered users